I wrote an analysis of the symbolism and imagery in Jeanette Winterson's Oranges Are Not The Only Fruit
for my 'A' level English Literature, back when I thought I knew
everything. Because I'd chosen a fairly narrow angle from which
to approach the essay, I fell short of the overall word count and had
to include an additional essay. This piece compared and
contrasted Blake's Songs of Innocence and Experience.
I spent a long time thinking about the nature of innocence, and how it
relates to experience, for obvious reasons, and ultimately had to
conclude that innocence is not the opposite of experience. The Songs of Experience really rather ought to have been titled Songs of World-bitten Cynicism And Weariness.
There is a tragedy in them that relates, not to mere experience, but to
the sort of experiences that break a person down and make them bitter
and hateful.
'Love seeketh only Self to please,
To bind another to its delight,
Joys in another's loss of ease,
And builds a hell in heaven's despite.'
-- The Clod and the Pebble, William Blake
The gaining of experience does not necessarily result in a loss of
what we generally consider to be innocence. Though we associate innocence with children, naivete
and wonder can persist well into adulthood. It is generally
accepted that innocence lost is a tragedy, because it can never be
regained.
moritheil: In his book, Wiesel argues that a broken faith is more whole than a perfect and unbroken faith.
moritheil: But, for me, the most beautiful thing is something that is unbroken, original, and free of doubt.
Most religions deal in redemption. From Buddhist enlightenment to
Christian absolution, eventually, in most religions, we are redeemed
from our wicked ways, and become something altogether much nicer - or a
slug - and generally speaking, it's held that this redemption gives you
a clean slate, and you start over.
Except, aren't you kind of broken?
I understand Mori's ideal. This is perfection in its purest form. Or perhaps it's purity in its most perfect form.
There is a famous broom. This broom was purchased many years ago, and the bristles on the head wore out. The owner replaced the head and the broom was as good as new. However, some time later, the handle was damaged when the owner dropped it, so the broom was provided with a new handle. Eventually, the head needed replacing again, but a trip to the DIY store soon resulted in the broom's restoration. Finally, the handle needed to be changed once more, so the owner did that, again.
To the owner, it was the same broom, despite the fact that it had been broken, fixed, patched up and, over time, replaced altogether. It continued to do the same job, just as well as it always did, and sometimes even better than it had before.
But it's just a broom. It's hardly a fitting comparison for something as intangible as Faith.
I started writing this entry roughly 2 years ago. I didn't really know where I wanted to go with it. I have a better idea now, because I've learned the lesson I failed to grasp back then.
I'm 28. I know some of you out there are going to scoff at how young I am, how inexperienced. That's fine by me. That's not quite how I see it.
I left Canterbury Christ Church College at the age of 19, two thirds through my first year at university. I cried every day I was away from home. I hated the place. I hated the course. I wasn't grown up enough to look after myself. I needed someone to hold my hand and tell me what to do. I needed my family.
I went home and tried looking for a job. I was considerably hindered by the total shame I felt at having left uni. As far as I was concerned, I had ruined my life. I would never succeed at anything. My academic career was over and I had no options. I had various interviews, most of which were agonisingly unsuccessful, and eventually landed a job in the Personnel Dept. at a company in the business of 'fleet management'. The pay was appalling and I found the job quite stressful. When I left, I had decided I didn't want to work in an office again.
I was 19 and I thought my life was over. The only prospect I believed I had was Drew. We moved in together. I spent most of my time missing him while he was in London. I would get in from work and sleep till he got home, only to get up when he came in at around 10pm. We'd then sit up until about 2am, and that'd be our 'evening'. We always went to bed together back then.
When that relationship ended 2 years ago, I really didn't have anything else. I'd had 8 years in which I could have done anything, but I hadn't because I didn't believe I could. I was so angry with myself. So furious! I finally realised that I was more than a failed degree (actually, I did eventually complete my first year, but was seriously ill - and hospitalised - at the start of the second year and failed to catch up, so quit again), a miscarriage, 5 blood transfusions plus a million iron tablets, and a series of dead-end jobs.
I berated myself for wasting so much time; time blaming myself for my failure; time believing I was insignificant and worthless; time on a relationship which ultimately fell apart.
Here I am, two years on, at the end of another relationship. This time, I don't regret it. I certainly don't berate myself for wasting time. I'm not bitter about investing that time and energy in a relationship that, in the end, was doomed not to succeed. I've learned that lesson.
A colleague recently remarked on my ability to always see the good in people. She said it wasn't necessarily a good thing for me to do. Another colleague laughed at me when I found an obscure positive in a series of difficulties arising in the kitchen, telling me I always find something to be optimistic about. It's lovely that they see me in that light, but it's not true. I complain a lot. I rant to my close friends about other peoples' flaws. I don't always see the positive.
But I do try. And, ironically, with experience, it becomes easier. Many people seem to consider me naive and innocent. A female colleage was shocked when I swore during a particularly stressful service. A male colleague recently apologised to me for making a joke about one-night-stands in my presence. I'm usually the last to comprehend dirty, racist or otherwise offensive jokes. But that's not because I'm so good and pure and wonderful, I can assure you. It's because my funny bone is probably dislocated, or something.
I am so flawed; experience has taught me that, and it's taught me that for my life to have meaning, I have to try to fix those flaws, and I have to have faith that the struggle is worth it. I want to be a good person. There are so many genuinely good people out there - people like Kate and Ted, Mori, Rach and Jim, and more people than I could sensibly list here - that I can be certain experience doesn't kill the innocence in people; the belief that the world is ultimately a good place.
Blake is wrong. He was a visionary, but wrong, and I think Weisel is right - massively understated, but right.
Of course, I'm biased.
I'm broken.
<3
Recent Comments