To say that the only people being affected by the anti-terrorist laws in the UK are Muslim is ridiculous. Why, there is more than one example of the same laws being abused to ridiculous extent against non-Muslims in the UK. Furthermore, the reasons for this man - who wishes to speak out such that he'll talk on TV, give out his name on TV but not show his face on TV - having been held are not entirely spurious; most of the others are still in custody. They must think they're on to something.
Along not entirely different lines - though perhaps the route is somewhat circuitous and the result tangential - should it be possible to imprison people for a crime they haven't committed? If they're planning to commit it? If they talk about it in an internet chat room? See, for some reason, it never occurred to me that there could be such a charge as Conspiracy to Rape in the UK. Sounds pretty nasty, huh? Add to the mix that the planned victims were children and you get a legal and media frenzy over the whole thing. Certainly the men require treatment, and should be placed on the Sex Offenders Register for the crimes they have committed - such as downloading kiddie porn and spreading it about - but they didn't actually rape any children. I can only imagine they'd all have gotten Life if they'd actually carried their heinous schemes out. Anyway, this doesn't half make me wonder how many other Conspiracy charges we have in the UK, and what significance they have in a society where people can be held without charge, anyway, just in case they might be thinking about becoming a terrorist.
Another conspiracy in the news this week is the 'covering up' of the 'friendly fire' incident which killed L/Cpl Matty Hull. I was appalled, today, watching the news, at how the story was handled. First, the name of the pilot who pulled the trigger, codename POPOV36, has been disclosed, and is being thrown about casually. Secondly, the media visit this pilot's home town, find the biggest redneck they can get, who'll say the most controversial things in support of said pilot and the US Military, and encourage him to make Americans sound like arrogant jerks who don't give a fig about the death of British troops because damnit there's a war on. Finally, they add comments from the pilot himself, who now makes a living training pilots, about how proud he is of what he achieved in Iraq, and make it sound as if he doesn't care about the incident, either. Which, as anyone who's actually read the transcript of the incident will know, is not the case. Furthermore, it wasn't entirely his fault.
If the situation were reversed, and a US serviceman had been killed at the hands of a british soldier, I can assure you that the US would not be mounting a witch hunt of these proportions. This isn't about putting Matty Hull's widow's mind at rest, this is about revenge, and about some bizarre perceived inequality between the UK and the US. If we want to be equal partners in everything the US and the UK get up to, then we need to simply behave like it.
By the way, in case you haven't heard, it snowed today.
Recent Comments